ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Relationship between the regurgitated and the aspirated volume of water. A manikin study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Femme Mère Enfant Hospital, Bron, France
 
2
University of Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Villeurbanne, France
 
3
APCSe VetAgro Sup UPSP 2016.A101, Marcy l’Etoile, France
 
 
Publication date: 2019-06-16
 
 
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2019;51(2):121-125
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The relationship between gastric fluid volume, volume of fluid regurgitated, and aspirated fluid volume remains unclear. Using a life-like manikin suitable for a pulmonary aspiration model, we aimed to assess the relationship between regurgitated and aspirated clear fluid volumes, and to determine the minimal value of the volume of liquid regurgitated that may lead to pulmonary aspiration of fluid volume ≥ 0.8 mL kg-1 (around 60 mL) that is likely to cause lung injury.

Methods:
Several volumes of water ranging from 30 to 150 mL were injected in a randomized order, at a flow rate of 20 mL per second, into the esophagus of a manikin lying in the supine position on a non-tilted table, with the manikin head in the extension or in the sniffing position. Aspirated volumes were measured in the manikin bronchi, by an investigator blinded to the volume injected. Aspiration was defined as positive when the volume of collected water was ≥ 60 mL for at least one of the five injections of each volume of water.

Results:
The minimal volume of water injected into the esophagus for an aspirated volume ≥ 0.8 mL kg-1 was 85 mL in the sniffing position, and was 150 mL in the extension position.

Conclusions:
These results suggest that the critical cut-off value of gastric fluid volume to be considered for the risk of significant pulmonary aspiration would be ≥ 85 mL (≥ 1 mL kg-1), in the sniffing position. These results should however be confirmed in further studies using other models.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617-631. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058.
 
2.
Lienhart A, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, et al. Survey of anesthesia-related mortality in France. Anesthesiology 2006; 105: 1087-1097.
 
3.
Smith I, Kranke P, Murat I, et al. Perioperative fasting in adults and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 556-569. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283495ba1.
 
4.
Hardy JF. Large volume gastroesophageal reflux: a rationale for risk reduction in the perioperative period. Can J Anaesth 1988; 35: 162-173. doi: 10.1007/BF03010658.
 
5.
Bouvet L, Chassard D. Contribution of ultrasonography for the preoperative assessment of gastric contents. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2014; 33: 240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2014.01.021.
 
6.
Bouvet L, Mazoit JX, Chassard D, Allaouchiche B, Boselli E, Benhamou D. Clinical assessment of the ultrasonographic measurement of antral area for estimating preoperative gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 1086-1092. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31820dee48.
 
7.
Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, et al. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination. Anesth Analg 2013; 116: 357-363. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318274fc19.
 
8.
Gola W, Domagala M, Cugowski A.Ultrasound assessment of gastric emptying and the risk of aspiration of gastric contents in the perioperative period. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2018; 50: 297-302. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2018.0029.
 
9.
Van de Putte P, Perlas A. The link between gastric volume and aspiration risk. In search of the Holy Grail? Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 274-279. doi: 10.1111/anae.14164.
 
10.
Raidoo DM, Rocke DA, Brock-Utne JG, Marszalek A, Engelbrecht HE. Critical volume for pulmonary acid aspiration: reappraisal in a primate model. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 248-250. doi: 10.1093/bja/65.2.248.
 
11.
Takenaka I, Aoyama K. Prevention of aspiration of gastric contents during attempt in tracheal intubation in the semi-lateral and lateral positions. World J Emerg Med 2016; 7: 285-289. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.04.008.
 
12.
Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T. Combining head-neck position and head-down tilt to prevent pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during induction of anaesthesia: a volunteer and manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29: 380-385. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328354a51a.
 
13.
Roberts RB, Shirley MA. Reducing the risk of acid aspiration during cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1974; 53: 859-868.
 
14.
Harter RL, Kelly WB, Kramer MG, Perez CE, Dzwonczyk RR. A comparison of the volume and pH of gastric contents of obese and lean surgical patients. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 147-152.
 
15.
Hausel J, Nygren J, Lagerkranser M, et al. A carbohydrate-rich drink reduces preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 1344-1350.
 
16.
Phillips S, Hutchinson S, Davidson T. Preoperative drinking does not affect gastric contents. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 6-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/70.1.6.
 
17.
Plourde G, Hardy JF. Aspiration pneumonia: assessing the risk of regurgitation in the cat. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986; 33 (3 Pt 1): 345-348.
 
18.
Ruetzler K, Leung S, Chmiela M, et al. Regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with a laryngeal tube: A pilot crossover human cadaver study. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0212704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212704.
 
19.
Piegeler T, Roessler B, Goliash G, et al. Evaluation of six different airway devices regarding regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A human cadaver pilot study. Resuscitation 2016; 102 : 70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.017.
 
20.
Szucs Z, Laszlo CJ, Baksa G, et al. Suitability of a preserved human cadaver model for the simulation of facemask ventilation, direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a laboratory investigation. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 417-422. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev546.
 
21.
Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Ishimura H, Kadoya T. The sniffing position provides greater occipito-atlanto-axial angulation than simple head extension: a radiological study. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 129-133. doi: 10.1007/BF03022009.
 
22.
Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 827-848. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371.
 
eISSN:1731-2531
ISSN:1642-5758
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top